What I did: Technology Coordinator / English Teacher / Girls Basketball Coach / Ultimate Coach at the Beacon School, a fantastic progressive public high school in Manhattan.
Email: chris [at] practicaltheory [dot] org.
Comments
Matt Skurnick about Sustaining the Teaching Life
Mon, 25.03.2013 14:05
Jon Goldman was both my
English Teacher in 9th
grade and Advisory Mentor
for my four years at
[...]
Karen Greenberg about Saving Lives v. Changing Lives
Tue, 14.08.2012 11:13
Perhaps a more apt term
would be "altering
trajectories". Think
physics - two objects in
motion [...]
Amethyst about Saving Lives v. Changing Lives
Mon, 13.08.2012 22:51
I really appreciate this
blog entry. Our roles as
teachers require, at our
best, a deep [...]
Mark Ahlness about The Long Haul
Mon, 13.08.2012 22:33
Chris, thanks. Pete is my
hero, and has been for a
while, but now that I'm
retired, after 31 years
[...]
Science Leadership Academy is featured (along with High Tech High and New Tech High and Gary Stager and Jane Krauss, nice company!) in this month's Scholastic Administrator Magazine in The Power of Project Learning -- an article about project-based learning. In addition to some cool shots of Gamal Sherif and Matt VanKouwenberg (and a nifty one of me, I admit), there are some great quotes such as:
Sometimes the results surprise both the teacher and learner, says Zachary Chase, an English teacher at SLA. To learn about the oral tradition associated with Homer’s The Odyssey, students were charged with finding a family story, getting a first-person recording of the story, and preserving it to pass onto their children. When one student found a bunch of letters from an uncle who had left his family to go to California during the Gold Rush, he used GarageBand to record himself reading the letters. He altered the voice to make it sound like that of an older man, Chase says. This project not only outstripped the teacher’s demands, but the success of the final project even surprised the student, he adds.
Here's Mr. Chase and SLA Junior Joe having some (meaningful) fun with video as Joe tries to interact with a non-netbook.
What is very fun about this is that it is an improv that started because Mr. Chase wandered over with the camera and came upon the kids at the table already having a conversation about the topic.
[Update: According to a local Arkansas news station, the officer has been put on administrative leave. Also of note, within a few hours of posting this, a reporter for a local Hot Springs travel magazine had posted a comment on the blog. Wild.]
Judge for yourself what you think of the officer's behavior. My two cents: I think that his behavior crossed a line. It was pretty obvious those kids weren't threats to anyone but his own sense of authority. And the kids YouTubed it. Good. Let the world see, and let the world judge.
If you are offended. If you think that this shows a real problem between youth and authority. And if you think it might be a good time to use the power of the internet to speak truth to power, then politely call or email or fax the Hot Springs Police Department. I have. For the record, the officer I spoke to says that they are not accepting comments on this, which is too bad and speaks to a larger problem because it appears that they have no feedback loop for the public, which I would say is a major issue. But that doesn't mean we can't call and let them know that we all are watching.
This from the original poster's entry:
Oh and just in case you were interested, the officer’s name is Joey Williams, and he works for the:
Hot Springs Arkansas Police Department
Phone: (501) 321-6789
Fax: (501) 321-6708
Chief of Police, Bobby Southard
Email: bsouthard@cityhs.net
Facebook now has online roshambo. So much for being a productive member of society.
(To make this an entry worth reading... it's moves like this that makes Facebook so well run. As opposed to MySpace, Facebook makes major chunks of its API available so that third-party developers can create apps for Facebook. It's not quite open-source, but it's close, and it means that Facebook will continue to add all kinds of functionality. It's a really smart Web 2.0 strategy.)
For all those folks who work in districts that block YouTube or GoogleVideo and therefore have been frustrated when they haven't been able bring that amazing video into the classroom, here's a post from Hackszine.com on how to download GoogleVideo and YouTube to your computer.
I'm excited about this in the short-term because it'll allow me to show the Web 2.0 video to students... but in the long term, I'm wondering about this.
On the one hand, this is good because it allows teachers and administrators to bring the content they view appropriate into the classroom. Now, anyone in charge of filtering can say, "Just download the video and bring it in... we trust your judgment to bring content into the classroom, but now we don't have to worry that the kids can view any of the inappropriate stuff on YouTube."
That seems like a good thing, prima facie. It's exactly the kind of hack that a lot of policy-makers would probably love. But I'm not sure it's a good thing because it sidesteps the larger question of how we, both as schools and as citizens, deal with the growing amount of information and content in the world. It feels like a 1995 solution to a 2007 problem. We need to teach kids how to make sense of more than just the content we present them with. We need them to make informed, intelligent decisions about what is and isn't appropriate, what is and isn't academic, what is and isn't true. YouTube is a growing source of information, entertainment and culture in our society... it's a bit of a muddled mess, and on a lot of levels, it is therefore the perfect place to ask a lot of these questions. But most of our schools can't even entertain that question because the site is blocked.
So yes, I'll use this hack, and I'll encourage SLA teachers and students to use this hack when they find content that they feel belongs in our classes, but I think it's a short-term patch to a much larger, much more interesting, much more troubling and much more thoughtful question.
If you are an SLA community member reading this at school, read it at home or on a network where YouTube isn't blocked. It's a really interesting, provocative piece about Web 2.0 technology and some of the changes it may cause in our society.
I'd love to see a discussion start around this video and the questions it raises.
(And if you are a blogger who has seen this linked to four hundred other blog sites already, I apologize...)
The Onion piece is what it is, meant clearly to poke fun at The Freedom Writers movie and Hollywood's tradition of making the Heroic Teacher movie (Stand and Deliver, Dangerous Minds, etc....) but it rubs me the wrong way. Here's the entire piece:
LOS ANGELES—23-year-old Teach For America participant Jonathan Fitzsimmons remains in critical condition today at Cedars–Sinai Medical Center after he inspired some of the most troubled, hard-to-reach students in his 11th-grade English class to stab him Monday. "Before Mr. Fitzsimmons came along, nobody had been dedicated and hardworking enough to show us that we had the power to make a difference," said student and stabbing participant Gabriel Salazar, who added that Fitzsimmons' innovative teaching games and insistence his students do their homework were just two reasons the class sacrificed their free time after school to inflict nearly 20 wounds to his arms, chest, and side. "He motivated us to show him—the world, even—what we were capable of." According to a statement released by Fitzsimmons' parents, the "impact these kids had on our son's life will never be forgotten.
I don't know, I freely admit that I might be overly sensitive or wrong on this one. It might be that I was teaching in New York City when Jonathan Levin was tortured, shot and stabbed by a former student, and I remember how devastated all of us at Beacon were when he died. Maybe it's because I met his mother a few years later, after she had become a teacher to honor his memory. I imagine that the writer at the Onion might be young enough to not remember that, and perhaps Dan doesn't remember that either. And perhaps, I shouldn't conflate the two...
But there's something else too... teachers take it on the chin a lot. I mean... I must have seen a dozen "Teacher Sleeps With Student" cases this year. Much of the NCLB conversation feels to me to be really anti-teacher. And everyone who has ever been a student seems to think they know what schools need. And then, every now and then, a movie or TV show comes along and celebrates -- in its Hollywood way -- the accomplishments of a group of students and a teacher.
And yes, the movies can be cloying (full disclosure, I have read a TON about Erin Gruwell and her students, but I have not see the movie) but I'm glad they get made. I hope it's amazing. I hope Hillary Swank wins an Oscar. I hope teachers all over the country go see it for free this week, and most importantly, I hope a few thousand young people see the movie and decide to become teachers.
And let's step back here for a moment -- we hope we can change lives the way Ms. Gruwell did. We hope we have the kind of profound impact on students that she did. She had 150 kids in that project, and 150 kids went to college. I never did that. Not once. Not one year. The highest college rate Beacon ever had in the nine years I was there was somewhere around 95%, and we were pretty damned proud of that. She had 100% college attendance rate. Many of her students are studying to become teachers. Her life -- and the lives of those kids -- matter. And if that's worthy of a Hollywood movie production, I'm really o.k. with that. Beats yet another "Saw" movie as far as I'm concerned.
In fact, I think we need more inspirational movies. We've got YouTube now.. we've got vlogs. Let's make a call to arms. Let's ask every one we know to tell the story of a teacher who made a difference in their lives. Let's make a patchwork quilt of 10,000 videos of people taking two minutes out of their lives to tell the story of how a teacher made a difference. And let's make sure it's a two way street. Let's make a vlog of teachers taking a moment to tell the stories of the students who changed our lives.
And let's leave our cynicism behind when we talk about our profession. There's enough about our lives as teachers that can depress us, dishearten us, frustrate us. When the moment comes when we can celebrate what one of our colleagues has accomplished, let's do so.
I saw the first Rocky on TV. I saw Rockys II-V in the theaters, three of the four with my dad. I'm from Philly where we treat Rocky with more reverence than we treat real sports figures.
I loved the first two movies. I enjoyed III as a fun movie, I hate admitting that I stood and cheered (with my dad) with Rocky IV. I even watched Rocky V a second time when I saw it on TV.
And when I heard that Stallone was making Rocky Balboa, I cringed. Then I saw the previews. Then I got excited. I decided I had to see it, but that I'd go in with no expectations.
I saw it tonight. I loved it. Is it Stallone's metaphor for his own life? Sure... but hey, so was Rocky. Did I love it in part because there were scenes in the movie that were a block from the theater? Of course. Does it mean more to see this movie in Philly, yep.
And is it a totally unbelievable, hokey, silly movie? Of course. But it also is a wonderful coda to the character, and it returns to the roots of the story. It's a slow movie that cares about its characters and shows what we originally loved in Rocky, the character. He's an optimist, and he's a sweet, caring guy. And, let's face it, no movie has ever done the "inspiring training montage" sequence as well as the Rocky movies.
I saw the movie at the Roxy, one of Philly's more artsy movie theaters, and even in an artsy theater (and all you need to know about Philly is that Rocky Balboa was playing in an art-house theater), folks were cheering during the fight seasons, and everyone stayed for the credits.
And hey, everyone is allowed to believe that they've got one last great moment in them, aren't they?
As lots of folks have pointed out, the first Google entry for Martin Luther King is a racist, slanderous site run by a white supremacy organization. Tom Hoffman points out there's a solution here. Time for a good old-fashioned Google bomb.
Tom's got the HTML code on his page. Grab it (I added the last link, since it's currently second on Google and run by Stanford U.), paste it, and let's fix the problem ourselves. It'll give us one less obvious example of why it's important to check your sources on the internet, but it'll give us a better story to tell about how the internet can be self-correcting sometimes too.
Comments
Mon, 25.03.2013 14:05
Jon Goldman was both my
English Teacher in 9th
grade and Advisory Mentor
for my four years at
[...]
Karen Greenberg about Saving Lives v. Changing Lives
Tue, 14.08.2012 11:13
Perhaps a more apt term
would be "altering
trajectories". Think
physics - two objects in
motion [...]
Amethyst about Saving Lives v. Changing Lives
Mon, 13.08.2012 22:51
I really appreciate this
blog entry. Our roles as
teachers require, at our
best, a deep [...]
Mark Ahlness about The Long Haul
Mon, 13.08.2012 22:33
Chris, thanks. Pete is my
hero, and has been for a
while, but now that I'm
retired, after 31 years
[...]
Gary Stager about Saving Lives v. Changing Lives
Mon, 13.08.2012 22:15
Chris,
No need to worry about
semantic arguments.
Others all around us are
debasing our [...]